"Person-centred" appears in nearly every disability provider's values statement, which can make it feel like corporate language rather than something concrete. On shift, though, it translates into specific, observable differences in how support is delivered.
A person-centred approach means checking what a participant's support plan actually says their goals are, rather than defaulting to whatever routine the last shift followed. If a participant's goal is building independence in meal preparation, support that does the cooking for them — even efficiently — works against the plan, not toward it.
The most common gap isn't malicious — it's efficiency creeping in. A new support worker under time pressure will often default to doing things for a participant rather than with them, because it's faster. Over time, that erodes exactly the independence the support is meant to build. Experienced workers learn to protect the extra few minutes it takes to do it the person-centred way.
Ask, at interview, how support plans are actually used day-to-day — whether frontline workers read and reference them regularly, or whether they exist mainly for compliance. Providers with a genuine person-centred culture usually have a concrete answer; providers where it's mostly branding tend to give a vaguer one.